|
GMU C4I Center Seminar
Pre Milestone A and Early Phase Systems Engineering:
A Retrospective Review and Benefits for Future Air Force Acquisition
Dr. Robert Latiff
Chief Engineer and Technology Officer
Space and Geospatial Intelligence Business Unit
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
Friday, February 15, 2008 at 2pm
Science & Technology II building, Room 320
ABSTRACT
Recent years have seen serious erosion in the ability of US forces to field new weapons
systems quickly in response to changing threats, as well as a large increase in the cost
of these weapons systems. Today, the military's programs for developing weapons systems
take two to three times longer to move from program initiation to system deployment than
they did 30 years ago. This slowdown has occurred during a period in which threats have
been changing more rapidly than ever and when technology advances and accumulated experience
have been accelerating rather than slowing the development process.
Many causes for this trend have been suggested, including increased complexity of the
tasks and the systems involved from both technological and human/organizational perspectives,
funding instability; loss of mission urgency after the Cold War; bureaucracy, which increases
cost and schedule but not value; and the need to satisfy the demands of an increasingly
diverse user community. Although the suggested causal factors have merit, a common view is
that better systems engineering could help shorten the time required for development. The
Committee on Pre-Milestone A Systems Engineering was tasked by the USAF to examine the role
that systems engineering can play in addressing the root causes of program failure, especially
during the pre-Milestone A and early phases of the program. Currently, few formal systems
engineering processes are applied to Air Force development programs before Milestone A. About
three quarters of total life-cycle system costs are influenced by decisions made before the
end of concept refinement, while about three quarters of life cycle funds are not actually
spent until after Milestone C, Production and Deployment. This means that although high
quality systems engineering is necessary throughout the life-cycle, early application of the
techniques is critical to avoiding or at least minimizing cost and schedule overruns later in
the program.
The Committee's report presents an assessment of the relationship between systems engineering
and program outcome; an examination of the systems engineering workforce; and an analysis of
systems engineering processes that need to be accounted for in project development.
This presentation will summarize the Committee's report and will include examples from the
speaker's career in military acquisition.
BIO
Dr. Robert H. Latiff is the Chief Engineer and Technology Officer, Space and Geospatial
Intelligence Business Unit, Science Applications International (SAIC). He is a retired
Major General, US Air Force. Dr Latiff establishes goals and investment plans for investments
in advanced technology and insures application of sound engineering practice to product
developments. As a career military technologist and acquisition officer, he directed a number
of major systems developments such as the Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS).
His most recent military assignment was at the National Reconnaissance Office as the Deputy
Director for Systems Engineering and as the Director, Advanced Systems and Technology. Dr Latiff
is a member of the National Materials Advisory Board of the National research Council. He received
his B.S. in physics and his Ph.D. in Materials Science from the University of Notre Dame.
|